Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Kamil Majchrzak vs Sebastian Fanselow Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Majchrzak vs Fanselow analysis and find out who is favored!
Kamil Majchrzak vs Sebastian Fanselow Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Majchrzak 1 - 0 Fanselow
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Majchrzak has won 59.71% of points on their second serve, while Fanselow has won 49.17%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Majchrzak, in recent form, has won 54.25% of their opponent's second serve points, while Fanselow has won 50.58%. The same stats for first serve returns are 37.91% and 30.45% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Majchrzak has saved 68.55% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Fanselow has saved 59.66% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Majchrzak has won 82.61% of matches played (W/L 38/ 8), with Fanselow winning 59.52% (W/L 50/ 34) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Majchrzak has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 66% (W/L 221/ 115), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 57% (W/L 38/ 29). Fanselow has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 63% (W/L 204/ 118), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 52% (W/L 33/ 30).
- Player level: In the last year, Majchrzak has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 87.5% of matches (W/L 21/ 3), where as Fanselow has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 47.62% of matches (W/L 20/ 22). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Majchrzak winning 1 times and Fanselow being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Majchrzak winning 2 and Fanselow winning 0. The last match between Majchrzak and Fanselow was at the Burnie Challenger, 25-01-2019, Quarterfinals, Hard with Kamil Majchrzak getting the victory 6-1 6-2.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:49:23.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Majchrzak and Fanselow have played a deciding set 0 times, with Majchrzak winning 0 times and Fanselow 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Majchrzak winning 0, and Fanselow 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Majchrzak has played against opponents with an average rank of 210.48 while Fanselow has played against players with an average rank of 236.58.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Majchrzak has won 80% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Fanselow has won 63% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Majchrzak has converted 46.44% of breakpoint opportunities, and Fanselow has converted 35.34% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
290
Rank
75
High
28
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
313
Rank
273
High
32
Age
R
Plays
W
L
L
L
W
W
W
W
L
W
Form
L
L
W
L
L
W
L
W
L
L
64% (371-210)
Career Total W/L
60% (355-233)
83% (38-8)
YTD W/L
50% (18-18)
$867,345
Career Prize Money
$3,105
4
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Kamil Majchrzak | Sebastian Fanselow |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 3 |
| Aces (Total) | 9 | 1 |
| DFs (Total) | 0 | 1 |
| Avg Match Time | 0:49:23 | 0:49:23 |
| 1st Serve % | 63% (26/41) | 78% (28/36) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 88% (23/26) | 50% (14/28) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 67% (10/15) | 38% (3/8) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 80% (4/5) | 0% (0/2) |
| Return Points W% | 53% (19/36) | 20% (8/41) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-1 6-2 |
Stats 
Kamil Majchrzak
Player
Sebastian Fanselow
63%
(
26 of
41)
1st Serve %
78%
(
28 of
36)
9
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
88%
(
23 of
26)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
20%
(
8 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
19 of
36)
52
Total Points Won
25
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Kamil Majchrzak | Sebastian Fanselow |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 83% (38/8) | 50% (18/18) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 77% (78/23) | 48% (39/43) |
| Games Win/Loss | 64% (564/320) | 49% (394/413) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 80% (16/4) | 47% (7/8) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 87% (20/3) | 38% (3/5) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 67% (2/1) | 62% (8/5) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.41 | 0.38 |
| Aces Total | 174 | 149 |
| DFs per game | 0.09 | 0.26 |
| DFs Total | 39 | 103 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:24:1 | 1:45:16 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 210.48 | 237.81 |
| 1st Serve % | 62% (1544/2507) | 58% (1417/2442) |
| 1st Serve W% | 76% (1167/1544) | 70% (993/1417) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 60% (575/963) | 49% (504/1025) |
| BPs Won% Total | 46% (150/323) | 35% (88/249) |
| Return Pts W% | 44% (1179/2674) | 38% (961/2526) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 100% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 33% (1/2) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 76% (16/5) | 46% (11/13) |
| Futures W/L | 88% (21/3) | 67% (6/3) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 84% (38/45) | 49% (17/35) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 43% (3/7) | 44% (7/16) |
| Deciding Set W% | 80% (8/10) | 64% (7/11) |
| 1st set W, W | 97% (38/37) | 94% (16/15) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (38/0) | 6% (16/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 13% (8/1) | 15% (20/3) |
Kamil Majchrzak Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Kamil Majchrzak
Player
Ji Sung Nam
56%
(
42 of
75)
1st Serve %
52%
(
49 of
95)
4
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
7
71%
(
30 of
42)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
36 of
49)
64%
(
21 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
15 of
46)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
32%
(
24 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
44 of
95)
95
Total Points Won
75
|
6-2 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Joel Schwaerzler
Player
Kamil Majchrzak
55%
(
27 of
49)
1st Serve %
59%
(
37 of
63)
3
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
1
67%
(
18 of
27)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
23 of
37)
68%
(
15 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
33%
(
16 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
29 of
63)
62
Total Points Won
50
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Kamil Majchrzak
Player
Ryan Seggerman
59%
(
60 of
101)
1st Serve %
59%
(
58 of
99)
6
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
5
75%
(
45 of
60)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
40 of
58)
63%
(
26 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
22 of
41)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
30%
(
30 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
37 of
99)
108
Total Points Won
92
|
7-6(2) 6-7(6) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Kamil Majchrzak
Player
Alexander Weis
62%
(
41 of
66)
1st Serve %
65%
(
53 of
81)
2
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
0
90%
(
37 of
41)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
33 of
53)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
64%
(
18 of
28)
14%
(
1 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
24%
(
16 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
30 of
81)
80
Total Points Won
67
|
6-3 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Kamil Majchrzak
Player
Jonas Forejtek
55%
(
42 of
77)
1st Serve %
61%
(
44 of
72)
4
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
81%
(
34 of
42)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
32 of
44)
63%
(
22 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
27%
(
21 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
26 of
72)
82
Total Points Won
67
|
6-3 3-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Kamil Majchrzak
Player
Gauthier Onclin
65%
(
39 of
60)
1st Serve %
67%
(
34 of
51)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
64%
(
25 of
39)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
17 of
34)
67%
(
14 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
9 of
17)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
35%
(
21 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
25 of
51)
64
Total Points Won
47
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Jie Cui
Player
Kamil Majchrzak
52%
(
25 of
48)
1st Serve %
55%
(
34 of
62)
4
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
4
80%
(
20 of
25)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
21 of
34)
65%
(
15 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
27%
(
13 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
29 of
62)
64
Total Points Won
46
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Altug Celikbilek
Player
Kamil Majchrzak
63%
(
41 of
65)
1st Serve %
54%
(
45 of
83)
5
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
1
78%
(
32 of
41)
1st Serve Won
84%
(
38 of
45)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
12 of
38)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
31%
(
20 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
33 of
83)
78
Total Points Won
70
|
7-6(7) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Amr Elsayed
Player
Kamil Majchrzak
56%
(
38 of
68)
1st Serve %
69%
(
38 of
55)
2
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
0
74%
(
28 of
38)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
22 of
38)
53%
(
16 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
9 of
17)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
35%
(
24 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
24 of
55)
68
Total Points Won
55
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Kamil Majchrzak
Player
Marek Gengel
71%
(
80 of
113)
1st Serve %
70%
(
78 of
111)
9
Aces
10
3
Double Faults
2
69%
(
55 of
80)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
55 of
78)
61%
(
20 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
18 of
33)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
34%
(
38 of
113)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
38 of
111)
113
Total Points Won
111
|
6-3 5-7 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
view more
Sebastian Fanselow Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Yoshihito Nishioka
Player
Sebastian Fanselow
68%
(
25 of
37)
1st Serve %
55%
(
27 of
49)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
3
76%
(
19 of
25)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
15 of
27)
92%
(
11 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
6 of
22)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
19%
(
7 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
28 of
49)
58
Total Points Won
28
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Taro Daniel
Player
Sebastian Fanselow
55%
(
37 of
67)
1st Serve %
53%
(
33 of
62)
7
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
3
73%
(
27 of
37)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
17 of
33)
53%
(
16 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
15 of
29)
27%
(
4 of
15)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
36%
(
24 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
30 of
62)
73
Total Points Won
56
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Sebastian Fanselow
Player
Thiago Agustin Tirante
63%
(
51 of
81)
1st Serve %
70%
(
64 of
92)
3
Aces
8
3
Double Faults
3
75%
(
38 of
51)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
39 of
64)
33%
(
10 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
41%
(
33 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
41 of
92)
89
Total Points Won
84
|
6-4 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| QF | 6-2 4-6 7-6(2) | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats
Sebastian Fanselow
Player
Lucas Gerch
54%
(
47 of
87)
1st Serve %
61%
(
51 of
83)
2
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
7
62%
(
29 of
47)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
28 of
51)
40%
(
16 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
11 of
32)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
48%
(
42 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
44 of
83)
89
Total Points Won
81
|
6-4 3-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Otto Virtanen
Player
Sebastian Fanselow
52%
(
32 of
62)
1st Serve %
52%
(
29 of
56)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
6
69%
(
22 of
32)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
17 of
29)
60%
(
18 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
35%
(
22 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
27 of
56)
67
Total Points Won
51
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Max Hans Rehberg
Player
Sebastian Fanselow
80%
(
37 of
46)
1st Serve %
53%
(
33 of
62)
1
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
3
76%
(
28 of
37)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
78%
(
7 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
16 of
29)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
24%
(
11 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
30 of
62)
65
Total Points Won
43
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Sebastian Fanselow
Player
Luca Castagnola
43%
(
41 of
95)
1st Serve %
61%
(
65 of
106)
2
Aces
1
7
Double Faults
9
88%
(
36 of
41)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
42 of
65)
46%
(
25 of
54)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
17 of
41)
22%
(
4 of
18)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
36%
(
34 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
47 of
106)
108
Total Points Won
93
|
4-6 6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alexis Galarneau
Player
Sebastian Fanselow
48%
(
25 of
52)
1st Serve %
60%
(
26 of
43)
4
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
1
92%
(
23 of
25)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
15 of
26)
59%
(
16 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
9 of
17)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
25%
(
13 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
19 of
43)
58
Total Points Won
37
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Maxime Cressy
Player
Sebastian Fanselow
52%
(
23 of
44)
1st Serve %
48%
(
27 of
56)
15
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
4
96%
(
22 of
23)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
17 of
27)
67%
(
14 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
17 of
29)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
18%
(
8 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
22 of
56)
58
Total Points Won
42
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Majchrzak Vs Fanselow Prediction H2H Images To Share
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Sebastian Fanselow
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
